As I look out of my balcony window in Cairo, I see competing demonstrations pass by on the riverbank, some in support of the Ahli Club, most in an appeal for national unity and healing. After yesterday's shocking soccer massacre, healing seems far away. Yet today, February 4th,
is the anniversary of the so-called ‘Battle
of the Camel’, the decisive turning point of the Revolution of January 25th,
when the peaceful democracy protesters in Tahrir were able to beat back a
vicious onslaught by pro-Mubarak thugs who attacked them on horseback. A week
later, Mubarak resigned. Part of the credit for the push-back against the
Mubarak forces went to the ‘ultras’, as the most extreme soccer fanatics are
called in Egypt, akin to England’s infamous ‘football hooligans.’
Today, a year later,
the soccer ultras are being blamed for a massacre on a football field in the
town of Port Said on the Suez
Canal ; but the real question is, who put them up to inciting a
riot? And the even greater outrage now debated in the extraordinary session of
Parliament and everywhere in Egypt
is this: why did the security forces stand by while Egyptians killed Egyptians?
Why the lapses in security from the beginning, not only in the case of this
soccer match, but in several suspicious incidents over the past week, and
indeed the past month?
In the minds of even
the least conspiracy-minded of Egyptians, one answer is inevitable: at the very
moment when there is the most pressure to abrogate the loathed ‘emergency laws’
under which Mubarak ruled for thirty years, and now the SCAF rules with
complete unaccountability- at that very moment, the incidents of suspicious
random violence are multiplying. It is hard to escape the conclusion that the
climate is being created in which the SCAF can claim that the people are fed up
with the insecurity in the country and are calling for a return to the
heavy-handed tactics of the police and the military.
Writing about the
Nasser era in my first novel a decade ago, I had said that in Egypt , soccer
rivalries replaced party politics in a country with a monolithic single-party
regime that prohibited any expression of political opinion. In today’s
post-revolutionary Egypt ,
the airwaves buzz with political debate and party politics are hotly contested
at the ballot box and in the media. But at what price freedom? How do you
explain the spectacle of Egyptians killing each other on a soccer field for no
apparent reason? One year from the day when outrage against the thuggish tactics
of the Mubarak loyalists united Egyptians behind the protesters in Tahrir Square ,
united them young and old, Muslim and Copt, secular and religious, ultras and
ulamas; one year from that hope-filled day, Egypt ’s Revolution seems to have
gone terribly wrong.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Leave a Comment: