Everybody coups,
let me say upfront, is not my expression but John Oliver’s on The Daily Show
last night. But I actually don’t agree with Oliver’s point about the June 30th
popular uprising in Egypt that led to the military intervention that deposed Muslim
Brotherhood President Morsi. Oliver seems to be claiming, substantially, that ‘a
coup by any other name’ is still a coup, to paraphrase Shakespeare; or more
vulgarly, ‘if it walks like a duck, talks like a duck, it’s a duck.’
But if Oliver
insists that it was a military coup that deposed Morsi, then he must accept
that Morsi himself, in his short but catastrophic one-year administration,
staged repeated unconstitutional coups-by-decree against every legitimate
opposition he encountered: he staged a coup against the military, decapitating
the entire top tier of generals, including Field Marshall Tantawi; to their
credit, the generals went quietly. He attempted to decapitate the entire top tier
of judges by decreeing a immediate retirement age of 60; the judges, for their
part, dug their heels in, and Morsi backed off. He attempted to decapitate the
opposition media by harassing and pursing talk show hosts and closing down
media channels. Morsi also staged a coup against the constitution, by declaring
himself and his decrees above judicial review while he railroaded overnight a
Muslim Brotherhood-cobbled ‘constitution’ against the strident objections of the
entire spectrum of the political opposition.
In other
words, Morsi acted illegitimately from day one, and was hell-bent on purging
all government and non-government entities of political opponents and replacing
them with incompetent but sworn Muslim Brotherhood. He ignored the fact that
his narrow margin of election at the ballot box came, not only or even mostly
from Islamist supporters, but from a wide swathe of the liberal, secular, revolutionary
forces that deposed Mubarak in 2011, and that only voted for Morsi in 2012 because
they could not stomach voting for his Mubarak-clone opponent in the election.
The irony,
today, is that Morsi’s Moslem Brotherhood supporters cling with a death grip to
the claim of ‘legitimacy’ as grounds for re-instating the deposed president.
The same people who now claim the sanctity of the ballot box forget that they
have always claimed, and still claim, that Shari ’a is above democracy, ballot
boxes, and man-made laws.
If June 30th
2013 was a military coup, it was a military coup by popular demand, not all
that different from January 2011; after all, it was the generals, in the end,
who went to then-president Mubarak on February 11 and told him that it was time
to go. So John Oliver is right in a way: everybody coups. But a rose by any
other name is not the same. Whether the Obama administration calls it a coup or
not makes a great deal of difference legally as far as aid to Egypt is
concerned. Most of the 1.3 Billion in aid goes to the Egyptian military, and
much of it comes back to the U.S. in the form of arms industry contracts; the
aid also guarantees Egypt’s adherence to the peace treaty with Israel. Suffice
it to say, it is not in U.S. interests to stop military aid to Egypt.
Not to
mention that U.S. foreign policy is unpopular enough in Egypt today without any
added grievances. To the bemusement of American media commentators, both the
Muslim Brotherhood side and the liberal secular side seem to be critical of
U.S. foreign policy at the moment, and each side is accusing the other of being
the ‘teacher’s pet.’ The unfortunate fact is that there is a widespread perception,
regardless of political bent, that the ‘West’ is carrying through a long-term
strategy of destabilizing and fragmenting the Arab Middle East, with Iraq and
today Syria as the prime examples. Until that perception is changed, whatever
the U.S. does, it will be damned if it does and damned if it does not.
But the
West is right to point out that the newly re-enfranchised liberals are
displaying heedless triumphalism and attempting to marginalize the Muslim Brotherhood
too harshly. Returning to the repressive measures of the past and settling of
accounts can only exacerbate the fractures in Egyptian society and lead to more
instability. The Brotherhood and their supporters are not going away; the only option-
difficult, distasteful, and uncertain as it may be- is to attempt to co-opt and
re-engage the more moderate currents among the MB in the democratic process, while
containing the more extremist currents. Bassem Youssef, Egypt’s Jon Stewart and
the Islamists’ bête noir, made that same point in an article recently.
Hubris
brought Mubarak down, and hubris brought Morsi down. That is a lesson that
should not be lost on the new liberal/secular administration of Egypt. Or it
will be ‘everybody coups,’ again.
I believe the crisis in Egypt is over.
ReplyDeleteThe military has restored order having killed the requisite number of people to establish in everyone's mind that they have the power and no one can oppose them.
I believe the Egypt-US Status Quo Ante has been achieved as was always the plan. Mubarak, as you have informed me, had to go as he was old and no one wanted a dynasty so an ephemeral and abortive gesture towards democracy had to be staged to segue to the next 25 years of puppetry in Egypt.
Thank you for the thoughtful comments. I wish I could agree without reservation that the crisis is over, but Egyptian society seems too fractured over the 'liberal'/Islamist divide for this to be the end of the story- unless the military crack down with an iron fist, and that would be a tragic setback.
ReplyDelete